.svg)
Our litigation team represents clients across a wide range of disputes, including contract issues, business conflicts, and more. We provide strategic advocacy, guiding clients through each stage of the litigation process.
We are always prepared to aggressively litigate your dispute – but we are equally prepared to vigorously represent you in negotiations, mediation, arbitration, and alternative dispute resolution forums that may offer a more strategically advantageous pathway to a successful outcome.
We have a demonstrated track record of successfully representing clients seeking solutions in cases involving:
Breach of Contract Claims
Class Actions
Construction and Mechanic’s Liens
Creditor / Debtor Issues
Equity Disputes
Landlord / Tenant Disputes
Officer and Director Liability Issues
Oppression Claims by Officers, Directors, and Shareholders
Partnerships
Proxy Issues
Real Estate
Share Value Disputes
Shareholder Suits
Stock Acquisitions
Should litigation be the most appropriate strategy, we will manage all phases of the case from investigation, pleadings and discovery to pre-trial, trial and settlement. We will not hesitate to pursue an appeal.
In appropriate circumstances, we provide representation on a contingent, flat fee, or blended fee structure.
If you are considering bringing suit or have been named as a defendant in a corporate or commercial case, contact our attorneys and let our experience help you achieve a successful resolution.
Our firm has a proven track record of success in general litigation, resolving complex disputes across various industries. The cases featured here reflect our dedication to strategic advocacy and delivering the best outcomes for our clients. Click the link for more details.
Case five
Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C. is pleased to share a recent favorable decision, obtained on behalf of Chinese investors, who are class Plaintiffs, that placed their investment funds of $48.4 million ($550,000 from each Plaintiff) into escrow accounts with TD Bank. The Court denied the TD Bank’s Motion to Dismiss.
Case Four
The firm obtained a favorable Court order authorizing alternative means of service by Whatsapp pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e).
Case Three
The firm obtained a consensual judgment in favor of our client, a publicly traded company, following two years of litigation when the Honorable Senior Judge Jed Rakoff denied our adversaries’ motion to dismiss fraud and veil piercing claims against the individual owner of a company that contracted with our client.
Case Two
The firm obtained a favorable decision against a national bank as the Honorable Justice Joseph Risi of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Queens County, denied the defendant-bank’s motion to dismiss our client’s cause of action for conversion for the bank’s acceptance for deposit a check bearing a forged endorsement and making payment on same. Under New York’s UCC § 3-419, a bank is strictly liable for conversion when it pays on a forged endorsement subject to certain defenses it may raise.
Case One
Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C. is pleased to share a recent favorable decision, obtained on behalf of our clients, issued by the Honorable Justice Arlene P. Bluth in Hongying Zhao, et al. v. Ardent Financial Fund, et. al. (Index No. 157066/2017). The Court granted our clients Motion to Dismiss in its entirety, with prejudice, and with costs awarded. Plaintiffs brought the following three (3) causes of action: (1) constructive trust, (2) money had and received, and (3) unjust enrichment.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
© 2024 Levin-Epstein & Associates, P.C.
